Movie sequels seldom top the original. But that doesn’t mean they can’t offer some useful real-world lessons. Take “Rocky III.”

The film starts with our hero having captured the heavyweight title by finally defeating Apollo Creed. He’s happy, wealthy and hugely popular. He finally has his mansion, a beautiful wife, fancy cars and an entourage quite content to enjoy the benefits of being on his team and keeping the gravy train rolling.

In the fights that follow to retain his crown, he easily defeats all comers. He doesn’t realize they are second-rate opponents who really don’t pose a threat to his bulldog approach to boxing and his innate ability to take some hits, power through and triumph in the end. He becomes not hubristic, but complacent, entitled and ignorant of real challenges lurking in the shadows.

Restlessly impatient in the outer world is Clubber Lang — hard, brutal, confident and hungry to dethrone Rocky and take his place as World Heavyweight Champion. Lang resents Rocky’s fame, fortune and cockiness. He senses a hollowness in Rocky’s position — that he’s grown soft and that he’s avoiding a real challenge from a competent and better opponent, because he has the luxury of doing so. Lang has studied Rocky and has dedicated himself to methodically and relentlessly becoming a better, more lethal competitor.

Switch from the cinematic world to the real world, and it’s hard not to see the United States in the same position Rocky was in.

In 1989, when America was actively contesting the Soviet Union on a global stage, the U.S. Army had 770,000 soldiers on active duty; today it has 480,000. The U.S. Navy had 592 ships; today it has 290. The Air Force had nearly 30 fighter squadrons in Europe alone; today it has 32 in its active component and a mere six in Europe.

The United States at that time committed 20% to 25% of its budget to defense, roughly equal to 5% to 6% of GDP, because that’s what was necessary to field a military able to be where it needed to be in sufficient numbers, quality and competence to deter the Soviet Union from military action in multiple regions — and to assure allies that the United States would be there to defend common interests in time of crisis.

Today, the Defense Department’s share of federal dollars has dropped to 15 percent, only 3.2% of GDP, enough to barely sustain what it has but not enough to replace equipment that has been used up in constant operations since 2001 — and certainly not enough to expand the force to a size capable of handling more than one major challenge. On average, America’s primary combat platforms are approaching 30 years old.

America’s combat experiences since the end of the Cold War have mostly come from dealing with minor opponents with no navy, air force, armor or any means to prevent the United States from doing what it wanted. Meanwhile, China has expanded its navy to 300 ships. It has invested heavily in shore-based maritime patrol aircraft and land-based missiles able to attack ships far at sea. It has built and militarized islands in strategic waterways, and has aggressively pushed regional neighbors out of contested areas.

Russia too has gained valuable combat experience in invading Georgia and Ukraine, conducting cyber attacks against the Baltic states and salvaging the odious regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria. It has renewed its military presence in the Arctic and has aggressively probed the seas and air spaces around NATO’s northern flank.

Both nations have committed major investments in hypersonic weapons, artificial intelligence, cyber-warfare tools, precision-guided missiles and nuclear weaponry. Iran, meanwhile — on a lesser scale, but perhaps with greater intensity — has doubled-down on its support to terrorist groups across the Middle East. And North Korea shows no sign of slowing down, much less eliminating, its maturation of nuclear capabilities, to include the development of submarine-launched ballistic missiles.

And yet within the United States, all signs point to flat or even reduced defense budgets in the coming years. Clearly there is no serious desire to fully recover from nearly two decades of constant operations against third-tier opponents. And there is certainly no intent to expand our military such that it can push back against growing challenges in several different regions around the world.

Rocky survived his beating from Clubber Lang and had the time and ability to recover, regather his sense of purpose, and reclaim his title as “Champ.” Will fate be as kind to America?

Subscribe to Daily Headlines

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Dakota L. Wood, who served America for two decades in the U.S. Marine Corps, is the senior research fellow for defense programs. This column was distributed nationally by Tribune News.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.