U.S. Senate race outcome rides on recount

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By JIM DAVENPORT
Associated Press Writer

Published: June 16, 2008

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) _ South Carolina election officials conducted a recount Monday to settle a squeaker of a Democratic primary as two rivals sought the right to face U.S. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham in November.

Engineer Bob Conley of North Myrtle Beach led the primary with 1,049 votes against Mount Pleasant lawyer Michael Cone after 147,287 ballots were cast. South Carolina law requires a primary recount if a candidate wins by less than 1 percent.

The state Election Commission said it expected all county recounts after midday Monday.

Conley is a former Republican who switched parties out of frustration over trade and immigration policies and the Iraq invasion. He contends that conservative positions on social policies are not owned solely by Republicans.

While the recount could prompt a challenge with the state Democratic Party, Cone told The Associated Press last week he would let the results stand.

Conley’s office said he wasn’t immediately available for comment Monday.

The general election is expected to see Graham pressed to defend his support of federal immigration legislation that offered a pathway to citizenship. That stand prompted “boos” last year when Graham tried to explain it at a state GOP convention and brought him a challenger in the Republican primary.

Graham easily won his primary over Buddy Witherspoon, a retired orthodontist and former Republican National Committee member who accused Graham of being soft on illegal immigration. The incumbent said he wasn’t concerned about Conley making an issue of his immigration stand in the fall campaign.

Also Monday, recounts were under way for a state Senate race in which Democratic state Rep. John Scott held a 77-primary vote lead over Vince Ford. In a South Carolina House recount, Republican Joey Millwood had a 19-vote lead over state Rep. Bob Walker.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( Brittanicus ) on June 16, 2008 at 1:25 pm

Both Obama, McCain and Graham have a lot to answer for, regarding that they sided with leftist liberal Ted Kennedy. Their idea of Comprehensive Amnesty last March would have helped to bankrupt the country. Because what illegal aliens cannot get in benefits now, such as free health care, education and a warm prison cell, they would have inherited after getting legal status. Ron Paul is not like Graham, as he wants the borders fence built according to the original plan and certainly no path to instant citizenship. Paul would eradicate the misinterpreted birthright law and stop all free welfare benefits to illegal foreign nationals. We can enforce our immigration laws as see in a few free-thinking states.
Restricted newspapers won’t tell you how well Arizona is faring now, after it enacted it’s own employer sanction law. Clearer highways, less-congested hospitals and extra attention to our own children in schools. You can open your eyes here: (http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/2008/05/15/striking-changes-in-arizona-as-illegal-immigrants-flee-the-state/#comment-62672 )

But we can strengthen our Nations and even Arizona’s limited immigration legislation, by demanding the Federal SAVE ACT (H.R.4088) Today. CALL, Call toll-free (2022243121 )
NUMBERSUSA.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement