Hearing finds Shelley violated probation in 2007 reckless homicide case

Hearing finds Shelley violated probation in 2007 reckless homicide case

Jody Barr/WBTW

Taylor Shelley is sworn in during a probation revocation hearing Thursday in connection to her 2007 reckless driving conviction. Shelley’s probation agent said she violated her probation when she stopped to eat breakfast on her way to school on August 28.

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Jody Barr
WBTW News 13 Reporter
Published: September 18, 2008

The Loris teen serving a probation sentence for killing her best friend, Kayla Bennett, in a July 2007 alcohol-related crash had a probation revocation hearing Thursday.

The crash happened near Loris and killed Bennett and sent Shelley to a North Carolina hospital.

NC Troopers did not collect blood and urine samples from Shelley, instead administered a breathalyzer, which is not admissible in South Carolina courts, according to Bennett.

The State Law Enforcement Division charged Shelley’s uncle, Gary Gene Shelley, with two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor after investigators said he bought the two 16-year-old girls a six pack of beer and wine coolers from the Loris Food Lion the day of the deadly crash.

At the hearing, probation agent Michael Thompson said 17-year-old Taylor Shelley violated the terms of her probation on August 28 after she stopped to eat breakfast at R.W. Woods’ convenience store for breakfast on her way to school at North Myrtle Beach High.

Shelley pleaded guilty to reckless homicide on July 14 and circuit court judge John Milling sentenced her to 10 years in prison, but suspended that to five years of probation and six months of home detention.

The violation came after Shelley stopped for breakfast without permission from her probation agent.

Thompson said Shelley had permission to stop at the store on August 26.

Greg Bennett, Kayla’s father, told the judge this morning that Shelley’s probation has turned into a “joke” and said the probation department was not doing the job ensuring Shelley abided by the judge’s order, “On the morning she walked in to eat breakfast I was sitting there and was shocked to see her walk in. I’d heard she’d been coming in there every morning,” Bennett said.

The Bennett and Shelley family negotiated the sentence in the case before the guilty plea in July.

Bennett said he did not want Taylor Shelley to go to jail for the crime, but asked that she be held under home detention and pay some debt to society.

Circuit Court judge John Milling agreed to the negotiated plea when he sentenced Shelley.

Thompson allowed Shelley to play in a week-long softball tournament in August after Shelley’s psychologist sent probation a letter stating that her participation in the tournament was part of “her healing process,” Thompson told the court Thursday.

Bennett made a point that Thompson did not allow her to participate in two following tournaments later in August after her participation in the first tournament was made public.

Thompson said his decision to not allow Shelley to play in the last two tournaments, “Since the media attention, her psychologist decided maybe it would be best if she stayed at home and did her exercise and participated in things at home.”

“This is not what home detention and intensive probation is supposed to be like. I mean, Everyday it’s something different and me and my family need some kind of closure,” Bennett said.

Bennett told the judge that Shelley agreed to the terms of her probation, but she’s not living up to them.

Shelley’s attorney, John Breeden told the judge that Shelley did nothing wrong by playing in the August softball tournament, but that she did make a mistake by stopping at the store for breakfast, “She did some wrong in getting a biscuit in Thursday after having been given permission on Tuesday to go and that’s why we’re here,” Breeden said in the hearing Thursday.

Both Thompson and Breeden said Shelley has been a model probationer since July.

Bennett argued that Shelley should be placed on a monitoring system until her home detention ends because he said, “without monitoring, she’s just running free.”

Circuit court judge Stephen John said that although the probation department found Shelley in violation, he was not “going to revoke your probation at this time.”

John told Shelley that he would revoke her probation if he felt the situation warranted it, instead he admonished her in court, “You are not now in control of your life. You are on probation. Judge Milling gave you an active sentence, suspended to probation. If you do not follow the terms and conditions of your probation, you will go to the department of corrections; make no mistake about that ma’am.”

If Shelley’s probation is revoked, she must serve the remaining time of her five year suspended sentence in a state prison.

Shelley’s driver’s license is also suspended through August 2013 and she must complete community service, speak to area schools about underage drinking, participate in a public safety video about underage drinking and drinking and driving, maintain a “C” average, abide by a curfew of 10 p.m. on weekdays and 11 p.m. on weekends, and pay an annual contribution of $250 to the Kayla Bennett scholarship.

Gary Gene Shelley remains free on bond; there is no word yet on a trial date.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( mominnmb ) on September 23, 2008 at 10:25 pm

PH, Are you telling me that if your daughter has a BAL of .05 and her friends BAL is .15 and she gets behind the wheel and drives 70+ mph around a curve and kills your daughter you don’t think she should receive anything more than probation?  I have been told by 3 people that Kayla was seen trying to get the keys from Taylor and she wouldn’t give them to her.  Kayla made a bad call by getting in the car with her and she paid the MAXIMUM penalty for that, why shouldn’t Taylor have to pay MAXIMUM penalty for her actions?  Do you have any idea of the problem Horry County has with under age DUI and deaths caused by under age drinking and driving?  You spoke of the burden of probation, what about the burden/pain her actions have caused us?  Losing Kayla has been the most painful heart wrenching thing I have ever gone through…..I’m sure my pain is just a fraction of what her parents go through.  Taylor made it what, a month or less before breaking probation and you think this is to large of burden on her…WOW!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( agm1954 ) on September 23, 2008 at 4:11 pm

You’re welcome, you’re welcome, you’re welcome,& that made no sense at all. You just want to have the last word & guess what?  You can.  I can let you have the last word. Why?  Because I can.  And, you might sling a rod if you don’t get it. Good night & sleep tight.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phtanner ) on September 23, 2008 at 3:57 pm

Thank you, thank you, and thank you for that intelligent response!

Here, let me twist your arm and force you and all those you speak for, to read and respond to this comment.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( agm1954 ) on September 23, 2008 at 3:24 pm

Well, after reading all the comments on here about this, it’s pretty clear Mr. Tanner is very bitter about something or just wants to pick fights with everyone because he’s the only one smart enough to understand life, justice & the American way.  So, PH, go look in the mirror & fight with yourself cause all of us are tired of hearing your constant hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phtanner ) on September 23, 2008 at 2:55 pm

“agm1954,“ your insightful comment is appreciated. It’s always nice to have someone express their opinion, as if they personally knew the person who they were insulting.

My first wife died of cancer, and I’ve lost two children to early death.

“Haderatt” gave me the impression from his emotion-filled ranting that he was female, and I am not surprised that you know him.

As for putting people down, I’ve found that most people don’t need to be put down; they’re too busy doing it to themselves to need any help.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( agm1954 ) on September 23, 2008 at 2:03 pm

PHTanner - You are correct, it is your choice whether you have faith in a higher power or not.  Some day the very words that are coming out of your mouth may bring you to your knees though.  Did it ever occur to you that your baby daughter could grow up to be on either side of the very tragic situation you are speaking of?  The Bennetts know that their daughter was drinking but being a teenager, she made a very bad choice, just like the Shelley girl did.  It seems you see everything in black or white but the reality you speak of is not always that clear.  The judge & the courts may have made an example out of Miss Shelley but it may keep some other irresponsible teenager from killing your child or my child in the future.  When you have juries, those are 12 individuals that all see situations differently, according to their life experiences.  Very few important decisions in our lives are made without our emotions becoming involved.  You’re the one living in a fantasy world.  And, since you keep putting others down as emotional cripples & being online psychologists,(very childish, I might add), you might be interested in knowing that your instincts are not that sharp either, Haderatt is not a woman. I know this person.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phtanner ) on September 23, 2008 at 11:08 am

“redeemer,“ there is such a creature as justice, and I firmly believe in it.

In South Carolina, however, it is very often, if not always, tempered by the mentality and discretion of the judge hearing the case. Therein lies the problem, as with this case.

As you are probably aware, judges do not have to accept plea agreements, or any recommendations of solicitors when deciding sentencing. Judges are free to interpret the facts in their own way and can reject a defendant’s intent to plead guilty.

This case “grinds my gears” because it is very obvious that this immature girl was victimized by a legal system too eager to prove a point. The legal minds handling this case should have known that she was too immature to handle the onerous probation to which she was sentenced, and the trial judge should have questioned their handling of the case, rather than exacerbating it with a ten year sentence.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( redeemer ) on September 22, 2008 at 10:22 pm

I have worked w/ many individuals in the Criminal Justice system who got much less time for a much harsher crime, so if there is justice, i don’t see it often.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phtanner ) on September 22, 2008 at 7:38 pm

“mominnmb,“ you are no better at the art of online psychology than “Haderatt.“

Not only am I happily married to the most beautiful young woman in the world, but we are the pleased parents of a gorgeous and brilliant twenty-two month old baby girl.

The only thing in this world that would make me happier would be for our little girl to live long enough to see this whole world “sing in perfect harmony.“

But I live reality every day, and I know from personal experience just how impossibly unpredictable life can be.

The fact that I don’t need theological faith to hold my hand so I can face that reality is my personal choice.

So what does all this mean?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phtanner ) on September 22, 2008 at 3:15 pm

Conway Gal, I am a man who believes that any gross miscarriage of justice should be publicized, and I never express my layman opinion on a legal case in an emotional manner. I also have no services to sell, and your perception of this issue is clearer than you think.

In October 2005, the Attorney General’s office prosecuted a man in Florence County that had wrecked his car while traveling at more than 100 mph. The car came to rest in a ditch full of water. The man left the scene, and when arrested several hours later, his blood alcohol concentration was still .11.  Upon investigation, the police found another man dead in the water-filled car.

Judge John Breeden sentenced the man to 9 years for felony driving under the influence.

It is my considered opinion that Taylor Shelley could not have been convicted of the less serious crime of reckless homicide by an impartial jury of her peers. I also have serious questions about her attorney allowing her to plead guilty to that crime and receive a sentence of ten years and the burdensome probation attached to that sentence, when it is obvious that she is not mature enough to handle the probation.

The criminal justice system tried Shelley as an adult to prove a point, and I have a very difficult time comprehending why everyone feels that she should be a sacrificial lamb to appease the system.

Taylor Shelley committed a crime, but that crime was nothing more than involuntary manslaughter, since it is extremely doubtful that any person could make a conscious decision to be reckless when they are highly intoxicated.

In my opinion, I would have preferred to see the Attorney General’s office prosecute this case, rather than the solicitor of Florence County, Ed Clements.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement